Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Izak Van Der Merwe vs Facundo Bagnis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Merwe vs Bagnis analysis and find out who is favored!
Izak Van Der Merwe vs Facundo Bagnis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Merwe 0 - 0 Bagnis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Merwe has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bagnis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Merwe, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bagnis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Merwe has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bagnis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Merwe has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bagnis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Merwe has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bagnis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Merwe has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bagnis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Merwe has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bagnis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
40
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
L
Plays
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Izak Van Der Merwe vs Facundo Bagnis For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Merwe VS Bagnis
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Izak Van Der Merwe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Louk Sorensen
Player
Izak van der Merwe
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Izak van der Merwe
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ze Zhang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Liang-Chi Huang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Izak van der Merwe
Player
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Player
Izak van der Merwe
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
67%
(
18 of
27)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
24
Total Points Won
20
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Izak van der Merwe
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Izak van der Merwe
Player
Ivan Endara
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Facundo Bagnis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Facundo Bagnis
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
24
Total Points Won
2
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gregoire Barrere
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
63%
(
31 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Merwe Vs Bagnis Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Merwe are available here and Bagnis photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
